Central wrote:
Link wrote:
Central wrote:
Link wrote:
BriBee wrote:
Moving to a spray isnt a new game so unless he specifically says "Simon says simon says is over (we're playing a new game)" then yes he's in the wrong. However if he had said okay were going to play musical chairs then simon says is automatically over because thats a new game.
Just gonna quote someone who phrased it in the simplest way for others to understand. Tobi was in the wrong from what you’ve explained so far.
But you can't just say 'we're playing a new game'; that's like with the warning rule when you say "Rush to my spray and freeze, this is a death-game" but you can't actually say that, you have to be playing a game for it to be a death-game. I'm pretty sure with this you actually have to state the game you're about to play, not say 'we're playing a new game' or if not then it would actually be logical to do that, because if we restrict that from the warning rule, why can people say 'Rush to my spray and freeze, we're going to (or playing a new game) play a new game'.
Please don’t make it more complicated than what it is. Bri has the right idea for what’s going and so do others in here.
Only two ways to stop Simon Says..
1. Simon declares Simon says is over.
2. When a new game is said and described.
“When a new game is said and described” but you clarified it as when you say ‘we’re playing a new game’. Which one? Saying what the game is (eg Soccer, Duck Hunt, etc) or say ‘we’re playing a new game’
Well if they say "we are playing a new game come to my spray and freeze, it would either;
A: be extreame word play because the would sound exactly lime how its written in the rules.
Or
B: be fine, as long as a game is stated or the intent to play a new game is stated.
Even if you think it is A i think using B would be much more practical, stop rage, and be much more straight forward.
Link
