Admin Meeting Results 5/21/17

EagleBby · **Posted:** Mon May 22, 2017 3:44 am

Doldol left during the middle of the meeting ;P He's gotta attend the next one aswel >:D Stop lieing :) I've got 11 Fucking screenshots of this xD

Birthstone · **Posted:** Mon May 22, 2017 4:52 am

Young Lean wrote:

Bourne wrote:

mattlikespie wrote:

[size=150]Admin expectation changes
Elites can target Members (excluding ban)

Mass Freekill (MFK) results in a permanent CT ban instead of a permanent server ban - Note: Staff+ Will look into granting Veterans permission to offline CT ban

Ctban for MFK? Why didn't you rather make it that 3-5 kills is ctban, more than that is perm ban? Because some people are going to MFK on purpose, and take a ctban.

Why? this means they will be able to unban cbans? I don't like.

Anyways just me being overly critical. maybe? still I have my reasons.

The server dies slower this way, not sure what you mean by "this means they will be able to unban ctbans?".
A permanent ctban would be treated the same as a perm, must be appealed on the forums.
Not sure what reasons you could have behind objecting to that, you're not supposed to perm ban people just so you can be satisfied because they pissed you off, we're doing it because they're disruptive as a CT and it's a lot harder to be disruptive as a T.
Honestly I think it'd be better if we went back and changed every perm ban for MFK to a perm CT ban.

Yeah this rule fixes a problem that doesn't exist. For some reason people wanted to change it, with a CT ban system that currently doesn't work. So we'll see how this goes.

Young Lean · **Posted:** Mon May 22, 2017 5:53 am

Birthstone wrote:

Young Lean wrote:

Bourne wrote:

mattlikespie wrote:

[size=150]Admin expectation changes
Elites can target Members (excluding ban)

Mass Freekill (MFK) results in a permanent CT ban instead of a permanent server ban - Note: Staff+ Will look into granting Veterans permission to offline CT ban

Ctban for MFK? Why didn't you rather make it that 3-5 kills is ctban, more than that is perm ban? Because some people are going to MFK on purpose, and take a ctban.

Why? this means they will be able to unban cbans? I don't like.

Anyways just me being overly critical. maybe? still I have my reasons.

The server dies slower this way, not sure what you mean by "this means they will be able to unban ctbans?".
A permanent ctban would be treated the same as a perm, must be appealed on the forums.
Not sure what reasons you could have behind objecting to that, you're not supposed to perm ban people just so you can be satisfied because they pissed you off, we're doing it because they're disruptive as a CT and it's a lot harder to be disruptive as a T.
Honestly I think it'd be better if we went back and changed every perm ban for MFK to a perm CT ban.

Yeah this rule fixes a problem that doesn't exist. For some reason people wanted to change it, with a CT ban system that currently doesn't work. So we'll see how this goes.

Are you new or something? Jailbreak definitely doesnt have the same number of active players.
Maybe if we put more emphasis on it Doldol will feel more inclined to fix it.

mattlikespie · **Posted:** Mon May 22, 2017 5:57 am

Bourne wrote:

mattlikespie wrote:

[size=150]Admin expectation changes
Elites can target Members (excluding ban)

Mass Freekill (MFK) results in a permanent CT ban instead of a permanent server ban - Note: Staff+ Will look into granting Veterans permission to offline CT ban

Ctban for MFK? Why didn't you rather make it that 3-5 kills is ctban, more than that is perm ban? Because some people are going to MFK on purpose, and take a ctban.

Why? this means they will be able to unban cbans? I don't like.

Anyways just me being overly critical. maybe? still I have my reasons.

Shoulda been there Bourne ?

Northside Shorty wrote:

So I take it if Cartoon and I sit through the next follow up meeting we are admins? I wanted to join because I really wanted to listen in on the changes to the community.

Yes you have to attend to obtain your admin. It doesn't guarantee admin though - you still have to apply. Members and future admins were invited - you were removed from this meeting because you didn't pass an attendance check

Link · **Posted:** Mon May 22, 2017 7:56 am

Wow this thread blew up while I was banned. Thanks Matt for updating us on the meeting with accurate info. Makes things way easier to remember. We made a lot of changes.

SemiAutoNoob · **Posted:** Mon May 22, 2017 7:59 am

Woah there where is the list of people discriminated against? Myself and other managers were "specifically" told "not" to attend. Dunno why we got singled out but maybe we wanted to make some changes. I expect us to retain admin.

Follow up meetings are a waste of time you've already made the changes and you won't make an subsequent changes so why not just quiz people on the changes to make sure they read them and move on stop with the high and mighty.

viewtopic.php?t=25069

GoopSauce · **Posted:** Mon May 22, 2017 9:38 am

SemiAutoNoob wrote:

Follow up meetings are a waste of time you've already made the changes and you won't make an subsequent changes so why not just quiz people on the changes to make sure they read them and move on stop with the high and mighty.

This....Why can't we just listen to the recording Eagle made and then quiz us or whatever on the meeting if the follow up meetings are literally just going to be you recapping the meeting.

Geeza · **Posted:** Mon May 22, 2017 9:41 am

The follow up meeting is most likely gonna be like 1hr why u bitchin :p

Ash · **Posted:** Mon May 22, 2017 9:59 am

SemiAutoNoob wrote:

Woah there where is the list of people discriminated against? Myself and other managers were "specifically" told "not" to attend. Dunno why we got singled out but maybe we wanted to make some changes. I expect us to retain admin.

Follow up meetings are a waste of time you've already made the changes and you won't make an subsequent changes so why not just quiz people on the changes to make sure they read them and move on stop with the high and mighty.

viewtopic.php?t=25069

I mean Semi does have a point.
Also yeah can't we just listen to the recording? For someone like me who, who was there the most of the time.
It would be pointless for me to attend a new meeting, when I can just listen to Eagle's recording, and go the hour:minute count, in to where I left the meeting.
Changes to that please?

Geeza · **Posted:** Mon May 22, 2017 10:10 am

wait indiglow is there???? he was out like 30-60 min eating his dinner

Register

Login

Admin Meeting Results 5/21/17

Print view

Previous topic | Next topic

Who is online