Mootinie wrote:
Siberiac wrote:
Mootinie wrote:
Siberiac wrote:
The wording is irrelevant because we know what the rules are.
But having them clearly named and specified benefits newcomers that do not know the rules and allows admins to enforce them with consistency, thus creating less drama and confusion.
On the opposite hand you have people who cause even more drama but putting something that doesn't fall under the rule, and raising hell when they get punished. Honestly depending on how it's worded there will always be drama. This is jailbreak, we're just talking about the lesser of two evils. Until we can have a rules list as in detail as the U.S. tax code, there will never not be drama about them.
Yeah, that's a fair point. That's why I was trying to word it as broadly but as clearly as possible. But in that case, it can be bought to the forums, discussed, voted on and promptly concluded. There's no reason you can't amend the wording of the rule to cover newfound loopholes.
I do believe that was the reason for leaving so broad in the first place, was so we didn't have to do that and we could leave the rule and not have to change it. To be honest, i'm super curious as to why nobody else has replied to their opinion on how to handle this >.<
Siberiac
