Doldol wrote:
Uchies wrote:
Peterson's work on the way in which political affiliation aligns with personality is laudable.
You should really check out some of his papers he's had published over the past few years.
And laugh hysterically as he knows nothing about politics.
Psychology, ok he studied it and while I disagree with his philosophies he does make fair points. I can get with the title of the chapter for ex. And I'm sure he'll make some good points.
But politics and cultural commentation please no. He makes it inexcusable as he uses his notoriety/legitimacy as a psychologist to propel his political/philosophical views and make them seem legitimate.
Well, I was actually talking about the psychology papers he's had published, but okay.
Peterson never asked for "notoriety", and if you consider his views at all "extreme", then that would be misinformed.