Technically, there's already a rule for this;

47 You must make sure the round progresses. Admin Guidelines

If there are 1 to 2 T's left alive, possibly on a war day or rebelling on a regular day, that's preventing the round from progressing them an admin is allowed to either beacon / tell them to progress the round

Let me rephrase what I had said.

To an extent, an admin is allowed to beacon either team evenhandedly. For instance, on a war day, if there are two CTs left alive still in war day zone even after the war day had expanded, meanwhile, there are 2 to 3 T's left alive sitting in either vent / secret initially delaying the round with still 3 minutes on the clock an admin should tell the player-base to progress the round as a war day should be fast paced and it's the admins job to make sure the round progresses. Also, this can include either team, terrorist or counter-terrorist, if they (either team) starts moving around. Great. No beacon. As the round is then progressing. After all, it should be the CT's job to pursue their role as they were the ones who had called the war day in the first place and should move forward with it.

Now if they continue to not progress the round (both players / teams are just sitting in corners) then it's appropriate for an admin to beacon both teams / players to advance the round. And just to add, an admin still has to make sure each round is fair for all players during which if there are possibly 5 CT's left with one T then of course an admin shouldn't be throwing any beacons on either team as it'd only be giving the CT team the advantage. Now as for a regular day, if there are no more non-rebelling T's left alive on which there is only one T left rebelling that's possibly camping secrets then as long as the CTs are pursing their role / searching for the last T then the round is still progressing. Not necessary for an admin to beacon anyone neither should it ever be as if the CT doesn't find the T in time it's their fault. Not the T's.

Most of this all depends on what is happening at that current moment. There isn't necessarily a right or wrong, per se. As for the beacons, they mainly fall into play on a war day.

Aside from a war day, it's initially the CT's responsibility to pursue the rebelling T rather than the terrorists.

By doing this it makes it look (to me) that the Ts have essentially no role play in this manner especially being Ts they can basically do whatever they want in any round if that’s what they choose, such as rebelling, kill CTs, or just hide or run away. With this in place it’s forcing Ts to go to the war zone and attempt to kill the CTs and not be able to hide and wait for CTs to expand.

However we’ve just got a new rule, and that is as follows:

- Warday expands at 3:30 Everytime. CTs must expand warzone if the CTs outnumber he Ta. CTs May use secrets after expansion.

If the CT team outnumbers the T team (must be alive), for example 5 CTs alive but only 3 Ts alive. If that’s still by the time warday expands, CTs must leave warzone and persue the Ts so it progresses the round more.

I don’t think this would be a good idea to force the Ts to participate in warzone.

For sure, basically the rule enforces the CT's out when war day expands being that they're the ones who originally called the war day in the first place, they're the ones who are going to have to expand it, no sitting in war day zone when T's are hiding out because initially it's not their fault that the war day was called. So, they're allowed to play how they want & if they wanna hide the whole war day and be a puuuuuuusy so be it but if the CT's aren't going anywhere(?) That'd probably be when you an admin should slap them to get out of there & find whichever T's are hiding; thankfully the "CTs may use secrets after expansion" helps quite a bit now.

100% agree; however I'm not sure if this rule when the Ts outnumber the CTs, do they have to expand? Can they just wait until Ts push, or? I mean sure, it's not progressing, however if we have to force them to expand to progress anyways, what is the point in this rule?