Terminator wrote:
look, i don't wanna be the party pooper here but how are the last replies on this topic about the topic?
like to me it seems that u are just going up against neezon because he writes what he believes, wether true or not u shouldn't really bang up against it, should u?
like no offence kharn, but calling somebody "arrogant and lazy" shouldn't fit here, or am i wrong?
like, u can feel offended or insulted by what neezon stated and claimed, but no reason to get so angry (thats how i interpreted it) about it.
like, personally i believe that terrorism is caused by a small group of extremists that use carefully chosen words and clever manipulation to get people to do theire dirty work, not for a believe or revenge but just for theire own satisfaction.
and those are the people that cause terrorism, the people that use problems of other good men and women to manipulate them so they start killing others.
but hey, thats my opinion... u don't have to agree with it and u can surely respond to it, but no need to get offencive is theire?
There's a difference between stating what one believes, at trying to write it as fact. He had done the latter, so he was asked to prove his statements to which he has declined. If someone states something as fact without reason, it's hard to have a discussion on what makes those reasons valid.
Doldol
