Elevated Gaming Network :: View topic

I don't really see any issues with this, considering that managers could fuck things up a whole lot worse than just touching a member with admin here and there if they really wanted to, or to pick the wrong admins on their servers. Since none of the current managers have done that yet (majorly fuck up their server on purpose), I generally trust that they won't do that. So them picking the admins and being able to touch members on a server that they essentially own (in practice), seems fairly reasonable. Just as long as staff+ can still deny people, and that people approved by staff+ to be admin on a certain server still get whatever admin they (probably) donated for.

Of course, I could be completely wrong in trusting the managers, and they could fuck up whatever server they manage, but I don't really see that happening with the current bunch. ;p

Xanderian wrote:

Make me manager of jb, i will add the good maps take off the crappy one and ensure habibi never again gets admin there. #simple4manager2k16

I also feel as if we should talk about Managers having a say whether or not a member, who has applied for the admin rank on their server, should get admin or not. Being the managers role is, and i quote, "Additional rank given to people who are currently running a server. They hold admin privileges and seniority (just below Staff) in the specific server(s) that they run." So why cant we choose the admins we want to represent our servers?

Also, id like to request that managers can target other members in their respected servers. Since we hold seniority just under Staff+, im assuming that managers are placed above Veterans. Veterans can target other members of EgN, so why cant Managers target all under them? This would probably help a lot for most servers.

MrGoldGames wrote:

If the manager dislikes someone for personal reasons but that person does follow rules and would make a good admin, what do you think would happen?

Author:	Mr. Simplistic [ Tue Sep 20, 2016 3:18 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 76th Monthly Meeting!
Xanderian wrote: I don't really see any issues with this, considering that managers could fuck things up a whole lot worse than just touching a member with admin here and there if they really wanted to, or to pick the wrong admins on their servers. Since none of the current managers have done that yet (majorly fuck up their server on purpose), I generally trust that they won't do that. So them picking the admins and being able to touch members on a server that they essentially own (in practice), seems fairly reasonable. Just as long as staff+ can still deny people, and that people approved by staff+ to be admin on a certain server still get whatever admin they (probably) donated for. Of course, I could be completely wrong in trusting the managers, and they could fuck up whatever server they manage, but I don't really see that happening with the current bunch. ;p Make me manager of jb, i will add the good maps take off the crappy one and ensure habibi never again gets admin there. #simple4manager2k16

Author:	SemiAutoNoob [ Tue Sep 20, 2016 3:44 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 76th Monthly Meeting!
Mr. Simplistic wrote: Xanderian wrote: I don't really see any issues with this, considering that managers could fuck things up a whole lot worse than just touching a member with admin here and there if they really wanted to, or to pick the wrong admins on their servers. Since none of the current managers have done that yet (majorly fuck up their server on purpose), I generally trust that they won't do that. So them picking the admins and being able to touch members on a server that they essentially own (in practice), seems fairly reasonable. Just as long as staff+ can still deny people, and that people approved by staff+ to be admin on a certain server still get whatever admin they (probably) donated for. Of course, I could be completely wrong in trusting the managers, and they could fuck up whatever server they manage, but I don't really see that happening with the current bunch. ;p Make me manager of jb, i will add the good maps take off the crappy one and ensure habibi never again gets admin there. #simple4manager2k16 +1 but habibi gets admin with full immunity

Author:	Applejack Rockwater [ Wed Sep 21, 2016 2:48 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 76th Monthly Meeting!
MrGoldGames wrote: I also feel as if we should talk about Managers having a say whether or not a member, who has applied for the admin rank on their server, should get admin or not. Being the managers role is, and i quote, "Additional rank given to people who are currently running a server. They hold admin privileges and seniority (just below Staff) in the specific server(s) that they run." So why cant we choose the admins we want to represent our servers? Also, id like to request that managers can target other members in their respected servers. Since we hold seniority just under Staff+, im assuming that managers are placed above Veterans. Veterans can target other members of EgN, so why cant Managers target all under them? This would probably help a lot for most servers. If the manager dislikes someone for personal reasons but that person does follow rules and would make a good admin, what do you think would happen?

Author:	Mr.GoldGames [ Wed Sep 21, 2016 3:02 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 76th Monthly Meeting!
Applejack Rockwater wrote: MrGoldGames wrote: I also feel as if we should talk about Managers having a say whether or not a member, who has applied for the admin rank on their server, should get admin or not. Being the managers role is, and i quote, "Additional rank given to people who are currently running a server. They hold admin privileges and seniority (just below Staff) in the specific server(s) that they run." So why cant we choose the admins we want to represent our servers? Also, id like to request that managers can target other members in their respected servers. Since we hold seniority just under Staff+, im assuming that managers are placed above Veterans. Veterans can target other members of EgN, so why cant Managers target all under them? This would probably help a lot for most servers. If the manager dislikes someone for personal reasons but that person does follow rules and would make a good admin, what do you think would happen? Then are you even mature enough to manage a server? Maturity comes along with manager, and you must leave your arguments elsewhere. Now, i meant to say that managers opinions on the persons history with the CLAN, not a personal history, should be held high. Staff+ still get to decide though.

Author:	Lyriati [ Thu Sep 22, 2016 6:23 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 76th Monthly Meeting!
No power so probably can't come. //rip

Elevated Gaming Network http://elevatedgaming.net/forums/

76th Monthly Meeting! http://elevatedgaming.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=22592	Page 2 of 2

Page 2 of 2	All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/