Elevated Gaming Network :: View topic - Clarification on the warning rule

So I was playing Jailbreak, Sarge was the warden and he gave the order "rush to the bottom of main cell stairs and freeze" at the bottom of stairs I jumped on accident. He warned me, then after he gave an order "rush to my spray and freeze on it" after a while on his spray once again I jumped. I have a habit of pressing space for some reason. it's all an accident thats the thing. And im wondering and looking for clarification, its one warning for EACH order. Correct? Did I need a warning or was it freekill? I'm confused at this point.

Exactly what North said.
1 warning for each order unless the person is doing it on purpose or making the same mistake every round.

Example: run to stairs no jumping and a guy jumps there while u do same order every round u can kill him

Terminator wrote:

To be fair I still would warn them. Unless they are detouring or delaying I don't care. Just get to the spot I told you to go, if you jump once and I said not to just don't do it again.

Just because you can justify killing somebody doesn't mean you have to.

Terminator wrote:

This can be easily abused.

Then turned into a thought crime.

You never actually know if a T is being a "asshole rule" or if he has a legit reason for failing to comply over and over.

Inbred points this out very clearly of having a legit habit of jumping. Thought crime him and kill him. Or warn him excessivly amd delay rounds holding up warning rule.

Honestly dont agree with your community's warning rule. To vague. Too easy to abuse. Too easy to thought crime someone.

20 Ts each getting a warning can legit happen.
10 Ts each getting a warning cant legit happen.
5 Ts each getting a warning can legit happen.

When does the ass part start and the legit warning begin.

Dont thought crime me. Every time I need a warning on a new order is legit and you cannot prove otherwise. Unless you psychic.

Because your opinion of me being an asshole or unnecessary is just that... an opinion nothing more.

Sarge killed him cause he thought inbread was being ass.
Inbread posts here cause he legit needed a warning.

Another conflict of your own set of rules.

Both players are correct.

Author:	The Artless Sheep [ Wed Jul 11, 2018 1:14 pm ]
Post subject:	Clarification on the warning rule
So I was playing Jailbreak, Sarge was the warden and he gave the order "rush to the bottom of main cell stairs and freeze" at the bottom of stairs I jumped on accident. He warned me, then after he gave an order "rush to my spray and freeze on it" after a while on his spray once again I jumped. I have a habit of pressing space for some reason. it's all an accident thats the thing. And im wondering and looking for clarification, its one warning for EACH order. Correct? Did I need a warning or was it freekill? I'm confused at this point.

Author:	North [ Wed Jul 11, 2018 1:29 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Clarification on the warning rule
IN BREAD CATS wrote: So I was playing Jailbreak, Sarge was the warden and he gave the order "rush to the bottom of main cell stairs and freeze" at the bottom of stairs I jumped on accident. He warned me, then after he gave an order "rush to my spray and freeze on it" after a while on his spray once again I jumped. I have a habit of pressing space for some reason. it's all an accident thats the thing. And im wondering and looking for clarification, its one warning for EACH order. Correct? Did I need a warning or was it freekill? I'm confused at this point. If Sarge killed you, it was a freekill. It is one warning for each individual order. You are correct.

Author:	Terminator [ Wed Jul 11, 2018 1:49 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Clarification on the warning rule
Exactly what North said. 1 warning for each order unless the person is doing it on purpose or making the same mistake every round. Example: run to stairs no jumping and a guy jumps there while u do same order every round u can kill him

Author:	Yiggles Moto [ Wed Jul 11, 2018 2:15 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Clarification on the warning rule
Terminator wrote: Exactly what North said. 1 warning for each order unless the person is doing it on purpose or making the same mistake every round. Example: run to stairs no jumping and a guy jumps there while u do same order every round u can kill him To be fair I still would warn them. Unless they are detouring or delaying I don't care. Just get to the spot I told you to go, if you jump once and I said not to just don't do it again. Just because you can justify killing somebody doesn't mean you have to.

Author:	Tricky [ Wed Jul 11, 2018 2:28 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Clarification on the warning rule
Yiggles Moto wrote: Terminator wrote: Exactly what North said. 1 warning for each order unless the person is doing it on purpose or making the same mistake every round. Example: run to stairs no jumping and a guy jumps there while u do same order every round u can kill him To be fair I still would warn them. Unless they are detouring or delaying I don't care. Just get to the spot I told you to go, if you jump once and I said not to just don't do it again. Just because you can justify killing somebody doesn't mean you have to. Yea you can tell when t's are being smartasses and attempting to be a smartass if they are pushing the limit is when i would just kill them.

Elevated Gaming Network http://elevatedgaming.net/forums/

Clarification on the warning rule http://elevatedgaming.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=31119	Page 1 of 3

Author:	Terminator [ Wed Jul 11, 2018 2:40 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Clarification on the warning rule
Yiggles Moto wrote: Terminator wrote: Exactly what North said. 1 warning for each order unless the person is doing it on purpose or making the same mistake every round. Example: run to stairs no jumping and a guy jumps there while u do same order every round u can kill him To be fair I still would warn them. Unless they are detouring or delaying I don't care. Just get to the spot I told you to go, if you jump once and I said not to just don't do it again. Just because you can justify killing somebody doesn't mean you have to. I said u can kill them (for the sake of explaining) Whether u want to kill them for it or not is up to the CT that sees it

Author:	jilly [ Wed Jul 11, 2018 3:08 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Clarification on the warning rule
This can be easily abused. Then turned into a thought crime. You never actually know if a T is being a "asshole rule" or if he has a legit reason for failing to comply over and over. Inbred points this out very clearly of having a legit habit of jumping. Thought crime him and kill him. Or warn him excessivly amd delay rounds holding up warning rule. Honestly dont agree with your community's warning rule. To vague. Too easy to abuse. Too easy to thought crime someone. 20 Ts each getting a warning can legit happen. 10 Ts each getting a warning cant legit happen. 5 Ts each getting a warning can legit happen. When does the ass part start and the legit warning begin. Dont thought crime me. Every time I need a warning on a new order is legit and you cannot prove otherwise. Unless you psychic. Because your opinion of me being an asshole or unnecessary is just that... an opinion nothing more. Sarge killed him cause he thought inbread was being ass. Inbread posts here cause he legit needed a warning. Another conflict of your own set of rules. Both players are correct.

Author:	Cooper [ Wed Jul 11, 2018 3:14 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Clarification on the warning rule
jilly wrote: This can be easily abused. Then turned into a thought crime. You never actually know if a T is being a "asshole rule" or if he has a legit reason for failing to comply over and over. Inbred points this out very clearly of having a legit habit of jumping. Thought crime him and kill him. Or warn him excessivly amd delay rounds holding up warning rule. Honestly dont agree with your community's warning rule. To vague. Too easy to abuse. Too easy to thought crime someone. 20 Ts each getting a warning can legit happen. 10 Ts each getting a warning cant legit happen. 5 Ts each getting a warning can legit happen. When does the ass part start and the legit warning begin. Dont thought crime me. Every time I need a warning on a new order is legit and you cannot prove otherwise. Unless you psychic. Because your opinion of me being an asshole or unnecessary is just that... an opinion nothing more. Sarge killed him cause he thought inbread was being ass. Inbread posts here cause he legit needed a warning. Another conflict of your own set of rules. Both players are correct. This is usually the mentality of people who abuse the warning rule. If you abuse the warning rule, you can be killed. It's usually pretty obvious if they person is abusing it, and if you arent sure then don't be an asshole about it.

Author:	jilly [ Wed Jul 11, 2018 3:18 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Clarification on the warning rule
Cooper do you just wait til i post anything to try to troll me? Legit question, no thought crime. Cooper did you read any part of inbreads post? If you did then you just called inbread an asshole when he just told you what? Inbread cooper is telling you dont be an asshole about it. What is your reply lol...

Page 1 of 3	All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/