Elevated Gaming Network :: View topic

Sugoni wrote:

No detouring or delaying is implied though. You just have to warn then kill for that.

Yes, and I was glad to find this implied when I came back to play. Jailbreak used to be frustrating on servers that didn't have this.

Sugoni wrote:

As for the no cheating rule certain wardens want to reward those who notice the warden didn't say no cheating. For example on spyvspy there are plenty of people who say 'first out gets reward' at climb making sure they or another CT at no point said use the teleport to die

Speaking of spyvspy, it's a perfect example for either case.

That climb is a popular spot for the cheating rule to not be declared, yet the race on the same map is the opposite.
Not declaring no cheating on spyvspy race almost always causes issues when tees immediately waltz across to the finish area and assert their dominance^tm, which makes voice chat erupt with confusion and sore egos. (which is half the fun of jailbreak, I'll admit =p)

I don't know if a server wide rule implying no cheating is the right thing to do, but at the very least, cheating players should not be able to act smart and expect rights if they take the risk of cheating a game.

Author:	Needy [ Sat Aug 11, 2018 6:03 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: New Rule Idea
Can you give a particular example as to why you want this to be implemented? Because I'm sure that whatever it was that bothers(bothered) you can probably be found to be against the rules. If it's a valid thing to disagree w i.e But anyways, besides the "no cheating" mid-game aspect. There is still a whole lot more that this can be (and is) used for any game that just adds more to either speed up the game and/or round (potentially killing off more T's to get to LR a bit quicker because we all know if a T happens to get LR they have little to no time left in the round) or to make it less, slow (meaning boring). Add some fa daz to the game kill me for using the "word" fa daz and make it more interesting, per se. But like break floor(?) especially on mcastle, we all know how slow the game is and how there are twice as many blocks than there realistically should be, so throwing in a "hey don't jump now" or "okay, now stay in your place" mid-game isn't so bad, only makes the game go a bit quicker. Could say it in the far start, but there isn't much you're arguing against to make it convincing enough to add the rule itself.

Author:	ArodGBP [ Sun Aug 12, 2018 10:38 am ]
Post subject:	Re: New Rule Idea
I agree with this rule. I was in a knife fight lr as a ct and the t never said no cheating. When i went to medic, i got slayed by an admin. Again, just more clarification on the rule list for games/lr would be great.

Author:	Terminator [ Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:20 am ]
Post subject:	Re: New Rule Idea
ArodGBP wrote: I agree with this rule. I was in a knife fight lr as a ct and the t never said no cheating. When i went to medic, i got slayed by an admin. Again, just more clarification on the rule list for games/lr would be great. U tried to get an unfair advantage. This can result is somebody not tolerating it and eventually can get u killed. It's a risk u have to take

Author:	Fren [ Sun Aug 12, 2018 12:24 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: New Rule Idea
Sugoni wrote: No detouring or delaying is implied though. You just have to warn then kill for that. Yes, and I was glad to find this implied when I came back to play. Jailbreak used to be frustrating on servers that didn't have this. Sugoni wrote: As for the no cheating rule certain wardens want to reward those who notice the warden didn't say no cheating. For example on spyvspy there are plenty of people who say 'first out gets reward' at climb making sure they or another CT at no point said use the teleport to die Speaking of spyvspy, it's a perfect example for either case. That climb is a popular spot for the cheating rule to not be declared, yet the race on the same map is the opposite. Not declaring no cheating on spyvspy race almost always causes issues when tees immediately waltz across to the finish area and assert their dominance^tm, which makes voice chat erupt with confusion and sore egos. (which is half the fun of jailbreak, I'll admit =p) I don't know if a server wide rule implying no cheating is the right thing to do, but at the very least, cheating players should not be able to act smart and expect rights if they take the risk of cheating a game.

Author:	Sugoni [ Sun Aug 12, 2018 5:26 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: New Rule Idea
Fren wrote: Sugoni wrote: No detouring or delaying is implied though. You just have to warn then kill for that. Yes, and I was glad to find this implied when I came back to play. Jailbreak used to be frustrating on servers that didn't have this. Sugoni wrote: As for the no cheating rule certain wardens want to reward those who notice the warden didn't say no cheating. For example on spyvspy there are plenty of people who say 'first out gets reward' at climb making sure they or another CT at no point said use the teleport to die Speaking of spyvspy, it's a perfect example for either case. That climb is a popular spot for the cheating rule to not be declared, yet the race on the same map is the opposite. Not declaring no cheating on spyvspy race almost always causes issues when tees immediately waltz across to the finish area and assert their dominance^tm, which makes voice chat erupt with confusion and sore egos. (which is half the fun of jailbreak, I'll admit =p) I don't know if a server wide rule implying no cheating is the right thing to do, but at the very least, cheating players should not be able to act smart and expect rights if they take the risk of cheating a game. Like I was saying before I'd argue that they should be able to act smart because it should be up to the warden to declare it before they start the race.

Elevated Gaming Network http://elevatedgaming.net/forums/

New Rule Idea http://elevatedgaming.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=31524	Page 2 of 2

Page 2 of 2	All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/