Elevated Gaming Network
http://elevatedgaming.net/forums/

Clarification on this order.
http://elevatedgaming.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=25322
Page 1 of 4

Author:  Vestrocity [ Fri May 26, 2017 8:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Clarification on this order.

I feel like this needs to be cleared up since some people don't understand this. In the order:"Take one step out of your cell, face the back of your cell, freeze.", do you have to be facing the back of your cell, or can you freelook? I've heard from Staff that you are supposed to remain facing the back of your cell, while being able to crouch, knife, move your mouse slightly, etc. Yet some people INSIST that you are allowed to freelook. So, how do you interpret this?
Edit: I'm only posting this here because the admin meeting results are locked and this wasn't clarified during the meeting.

Author:  Shya [ Fri May 26, 2017 8:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Clarification on this order.

on my side i feel that they should free look since its just a regular freeze just as long as you look at the back of your cell at least one since its implied in the order.

Author:  mattlikespie [ Fri May 26, 2017 9:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Clarification on this order.

The Flash wrote:
I've heard from Staff that you are supposed to remain facing the back of your cell, while being able to crouch, knife, move your mouse slightly, etc.

If you've heard from Staff then what's to clarify js lol. But otherwise, yes, this is correct.

Freeze is defined in the rules; basically says no WASD. The warden says to freeze, but also gives a direction to face, placing a constraint on the freeze order. Kinda like when they say crouch to the bottom of main cell stairs, but jumping is restricted. That's a constraint on the order. So, yes, you should still face the back of your cell and be able to do as you described.

Author:  Vestrocity [ Fri May 26, 2017 10:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Clarification on this order.

mattlikespie wrote:
The Flash wrote:
I've heard from Staff that you are supposed to remain facing the back of your cell, while being able to crouch, knife, move your mouse slightly, etc.

If you've heard from Staff then what's to clarify js lol. But otherwise, yes, this is correct.

Freeze is defined in the rules; basically says no WASD. The warden says to freeze, but also gives a direction to face, placing a constraint on the freeze order. Kinda like when they say crouch to the bottom of main cell stairs, but jumping is restricted. That's a constraint on the order. So, yes, you should still face the back of your cell and be able to do as you described.

I know, and I don't mean to be rude, but some members just don't understand for whatever reason. But yea time to get falsely banned for "MFK". jk I hope that any admins that are on if I do this have read this or already know.

Author:  Ash [ Sat May 27, 2017 3:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Clarification on this order.

The Flash wrote:
mattlikespie wrote:
The Flash wrote:
I've heard from Staff that you are supposed to remain facing the back of your cell, while being able to crouch, knife, move your mouse slightly, etc.

If you've heard from Staff then what's to clarify js lol. But otherwise, yes, this is correct.

Freeze is defined in the rules; basically says no WASD. The warden says to freeze, but also gives a direction to face, placing a constraint on the freeze order. Kinda like when they say crouch to the bottom of main cell stairs, but jumping is restricted. That's a constraint on the order. So, yes, you should still face the back of your cell and be able to do as you described.

I know, and I don't mean to be rude, but some members just don't understand for whatever reason. But yea time to get falsely banned for "MFK". jk I hope that any admins that are on if I do this have read this or already know.

I mean now it is atleast written black on white.
I've been playing like that for a lot of time. Because just because we don't say afk freeze, doesn't mean we can't force you to look in a certain direction.

Author:  Doldol [ Sat May 27, 2017 4:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Clarification on this order.

Hey what about being a decent person and asking the CT to clarify?

Author:  Ash [ Sat May 27, 2017 6:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Clarification on this order.

Doldol wrote:
Hey what about being a decent person and asking the CT to clarify?

This was never about the CT having to clarify.
We needed as a clan to clarify the rule.

Author:  Doldol [ Sat May 27, 2017 9:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Clarification on this order.

Ash wrote:
Doldol wrote:
Hey what about being a decent person and asking the CT to clarify?

This was never about the CT having to clarify.
We needed as a clan to clarify the rule.


We did? Why?

Author:  Ash [ Sat May 27, 2017 10:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Clarification on this order.

Doldol wrote:
Ash wrote:
Doldol wrote:
Hey what about being a decent person and asking the CT to clarify?

This was never about the CT having to clarify.
We needed as a clan to clarify the rule.


We did? Why?

Yeah but if you ask the CT to clarify this. And we hadn't clarified it?
See where my point leads?

Author:  Doldol [ Sat May 27, 2017 10:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Clarification on this order.

Ash wrote:
Doldol wrote:
Ash wrote:
Doldol wrote:
Hey what about being a decent person and asking the CT to clarify?

This was never about the CT having to clarify.
We needed as a clan to clarify the rule.


We did? Why?

Yeah but if you ask the CT to clarify this. And we hadn't clarified it?
See where my point leads?

No, you're making no sense at all to me.

Page 1 of 4 All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/