Elevated Gaming Network
http://elevatedgaming.net/forums/

Admin Meeting Results 10/14/17
http://elevatedgaming.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=27498
Page 4 of 6

Author:  Roaxes [ Sun Oct 29, 2017 9:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Admin Meeting Results 10/14/17

Yea he must warn them as it wasn't a death game and tell them he didn't say every time, he was just transporting them, UNLESS they're moving to rebel like to a vent or such.

Author:  Needy [ Sun Oct 29, 2017 9:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Admin Meeting Results 10/14/17

Roaxes wrote:
Yea he must warn them as it wasn't a death game and tell them he didn't say every time, he was just transporting them, UNLESS they're moving to rebel like to a vent or such.

thanks mis roaxes96

Author:  Minion [ Sun Oct 29, 2017 2:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Admin Meeting Results 10/14/17

Minion wrote:
every month, being a ct becomes even worse.

nvm this new rule is fun.

Author:  Geeza [ Sun Oct 29, 2017 3:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Admin Meeting Results 10/14/17

Minion wrote:
Minion wrote:
every month, being a ct becomes even worse.

nvm this new rule is fun.

Yes because you get to abuse it, which I don't recommend as you'll be punished for it.

Author:  Minion [ Sun Oct 29, 2017 4:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Admin Meeting Results 10/14/17

Mr.Geeza wrote:
Minion wrote:
Minion wrote:
every month, being a ct becomes even worse.

nvm this new rule is fun.

Yes because you get to abuse it, which I don't recommend as you'll be punished for it.

If everyone abuses it, no one does

Author:  Central [ Sun Oct 29, 2017 4:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Admin Meeting Results 10/14/17

Minion wrote:
Mr.Geeza wrote:
Minion wrote:
Minion wrote:
every month, being a ct becomes even worse.

nvm this new rule is fun.

Yes because you get to abuse it, which I don't recommend as you'll be punished for it.

If everyone abuses it, no one does

What lmao? This doesn’t make sense

Author:  Birthstone [ Sun Oct 29, 2017 5:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Admin Meeting Results 10/14/17

Central wrote:
What lmao? This doesn’t make sense


I see you've just met Minion

Author:  Jimmah [ Sun Oct 29, 2017 6:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Admin Meeting Results 10/14/17

I see the "warning rule" as a method to stop CTs from killing t's who might have misheard/misinterperated a order.

At the end of the day, the only time a T should actually be shot is if they loose a game or are rebelling.

A t who thought they should have followed a spray when in fact they should have been frozen shouldn't automatically be killed

Author:  Minion [ Sun Oct 29, 2017 7:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Admin Meeting Results 10/14/17

Honestly I don’t know how the warning rule got past 20+ admins (Unless kharn said “XDXDXD FUCK YOU i’m KHARN KABLAMMO NEW RULE” then I’d understand how it got through). It is so easy to exploit for both to aid you in the round AND to troll. Now your typical admin response would be “oh we’ll just punish you if you abuse it” but it’s just so easy to just pretend like you didn’t know what you were doing (unless you pull a terminator and use it multiple times in a round.) i’m not against the rule because it has made me like jb more while I am on either side. On T side, I like testing how much I can get away with and on ct it’s funny seeing other people test it (yes I know I am praising delaying I am a bad guy).

TL;DR: How did you guys not realize when voting on it how easily the warning rule can/would be exploited and if you did why on god’s earth would you pass it. Also, please don’t remove it.

Author:  winter [ Sun Oct 29, 2017 7:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Admin Meeting Results 10/14/17

Minion wrote:
Honestly I don’t know how the warning rule got past 20+ admins (Unless kharn said “XDXDXD FUCK YOU i’m KHARN KABLAMMO NEW RULE” then I’d understand how it got through). It is so easy to exploit for both to aid you in the round AND to troll. Now your typical admin response would be “oh we’ll just punish you if you abuse it” but it’s just so easy to just pretend like you didn’t know what you were doing (unless you pull a terminator and use it multiple times in a round.) i’m not against the rule because it has made me like jb more while I am on either side. On T side, I like testing how much I can get away with and on ct it’s funny seeing other people test it (yes I know I am praising delaying I am a bad guy).

TL;DR: How did you guys not realize when voting on it how easily the warning rule can/would be exploited and if you did why on god’s earth would you pass it. Also, please don’t remove it.


Being a smartass... For example, If a T is just running out of cells and get killed by a CT, and said you didn't warned me, then obviously exploiting the rule, goes into the category of being a smartass, so that gives the CT, the right to kill them. The new rule is still in work of progress.

Page 4 of 6 All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/