Elevated Gaming Network http://elevatedgaming.net/forums/ |
|
Admin Meeting Results 5/21/17 http://elevatedgaming.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=25274 |
Page 1 of 5 |
Author: | mattlikespie [ Sun May 21, 2017 6:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Admin Meeting Results 5/21/17 |
Admin meeting was today; here's what happened in the record 4 and a half hour meeting. Went over all JB rules and admin expectations. Answered any questions and clarified all rules. Then, we voted on changes. Admin expectation changes Elites can target Members (excluding ban) Mass Freekill (MFK) results in a permanent CT ban instead of a permanent server ban - Note: Staff+ Will look into granting Veterans permission to offline CT ban Rules changes A freeday may not be given revised to The highest ranking admin may grant a freeday during the first round of the map No excessive wardays revised to No excessive wardays (No more than 2 wardays in a row) Simon says is over when a new game to play is defined. revised to Simon says is over when a new game to play is stated. Do not bait (give guns to Ts). revised to Do not give weapons/grenades to Terrorists Prisoners (T) cannot be forced to face a certain direction for extended periods of time. revised to Terrorists cannot be forced to face a certain direction for longer than one minute Secret weapons NOT picked up by T's must remain where they spawn. revised to Secret weapons/abilities NOT picked up by T's must remain where they spawn. New rules A warday may only be called in 2 or less adjacent locations (CT rule) Use sprays only to transport terrorists (CT rule) Lead CT opens cells on warday unless cells auto-open (CT rule) A Terrorist granted Last Request is only rebelling if they wound a CT without reason (T rule) Clarifications: Joke day/Opinionated Days are always refusable Misc. Paradise prison map removed These changes will come into effect June 1st. These changes were voted upon by your very own Jailbreak admins. Follow-up Admin meetings are not to change anything, simply to cover what was changed, and review the rules, etc. More info here Attendance These are the only admins who were credited for full attendance. Link Marz SexySimonSays EagleBby toni Rias Mikailmanco indiglow IamNaCl mattlikespie Phillip Doldol Any admin not on the above list will lose admin if they do not attend a follow up meeting. Additional admins who attended part of the meeting (Will still lose admin!! (except Staff )): Zachariah Birthstone Inori Mozzie Goopsauce Ash jjjjjj.jack Needy El_Xanatos Ms. Guggy Shya Wolfie Mr. Geeza Cartoon Slays Northside Shorty Mr. GoldGames Bourne Mr. Kharn Sinister xnyc Note: Eagle recorded the entire meeting. Look forward to a PM from him with the recording(s). |
Author: | Birthstone [ Sun May 21, 2017 6:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Admin Meeting Results 5/21/17 |
oi why you trying to take my job from me I only had 2 hours available, there's really no reason meetings should go past that long, we can do much better than that. Monthly meetings cover every server and rarely go over 2 hours. This meeting covered admin guidelines and one server (JB) and went over 4 hours? Again, we can do a lot better, Fortune 500 companies wouldn't ever have a meeting that took up more than half a workday, we shouldn't either. |
Author: | mattlikespie [ Sun May 21, 2017 7:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Admin Meeting Results 5/21/17 |
Birthstone wrote: oi why you trying to take my job from me I only had 2 hours available, there's really no reason meetings should go past that long, we can do much better than that. Monthly meetings cover every server and rarely go over 2 hours. This meeting covered admin guidelines and one server (JB) and went over 4 hours? Again, we can do a lot better. I've been here for over 3 years and this was the shortest admin meeting I've ever attended. Sorry for taking your job but you left :3 |
Author: | Birthstone [ Sun May 21, 2017 7:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Admin Meeting Results 5/21/17 |
mattlikespie wrote: Birthstone wrote: oi why you trying to take my job from me I only had 2 hours available, there's really no reason meetings should go past that long, we can do much better than that. Monthly meetings cover every server and rarely go over 2 hours. This meeting covered admin guidelines and one server (JB) and went over 4 hours? Again, we can do a lot better. I've been here for over 3 years and this was the shortest admin meeting I've ever attended. Sorry for taking your job but you left :3 I've been here for about 4 years (plus or minus a few months) and I've attended lightning-fast admin meetings. A long meeting isn't necessarily a good meeting. People have shit to do, especially during finals week (myself included). I'm updating my thread with the info from this one / Eagle's eventual recordings. Also the official JB rules still need clarification and changes, you do that and I'll fine-tune my summary, deal? |
Author: | mattlikespie [ Sun May 21, 2017 7:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Admin Meeting Results 5/21/17 |
Birthstone wrote: mattlikespie wrote: Birthstone wrote: oi why you trying to take my job from me I only had 2 hours available, there's really no reason meetings should go past that long, we can do much better than that. Monthly meetings cover every server and rarely go over 2 hours. This meeting covered admin guidelines and one server (JB) and went over 4 hours? Again, we can do a lot better. I've been here for over 3 years and this was the shortest admin meeting I've ever attended. Sorry for taking your job but you left :3 I've been here for about 4 years (plus or minus a few months) and I've attended lightning-fast admin meetings. A long meeting isn't necessarily a good meeting. People have shit to do, especially during finals week (myself included). I'm updating my thread with the info from this one / Eagle's eventual recordings. Also the official JB rules still need clarification and changes, you do that and I'll fine-tune my summary, deal? I mean if you were actually there/listen to the recordings I don't see any way that that meeting could have been (significantly) quicker. And considering you weren't, I made this. |
Author: | Birthstone [ Sun May 21, 2017 7:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Admin Meeting Results 5/21/17 |
mattlikespie wrote: I mean if you were actually there/listen to the recordings I don't see any way that that meeting could have been (significantly) quicker. And considering you weren't, I made this. There's always room for improvement. Just because we've always done something a certain way doesn't mean that's the right way to do things. Like I said, no business would ever expect employees to sit through a full 4 and half hour meeting, so why should a video gaming community? And I was there, as I said (multiple times now) I only had time for about 2 hours, which is more than reasonable to expect from people on a Sunday afternoon. |
Author: | Mr.GoldGames [ Sun May 21, 2017 7:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Admin Meeting Results 5/21/17 |
Let's not play "Whose cock is longer." Thanks to you both for making these, so that the community can be well informed. |
Author: | Bourne [ Mon May 22, 2017 12:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Admin Meeting Results 5/21/17 |
mattlikespie wrote: [size=150]Admin expectation changes Elites can target Members (excluding ban) Mass Freekill (MFK) results in a permanent CT ban instead of a permanent server ban - Note: Staff+ Will look into granting Veterans permission to offline CT ban Ctban for MFK? Why didn't you rather make it that 3-5 kills is ctban, more than that is perm ban? Because some people are going to MFK on purpose, and take a ctban. Why? this means they will be able to unban cbans? I don't like. Anyways just me being overly critical. maybe? still I have my reasons. |
Author: | Young Lean [ Mon May 22, 2017 12:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Admin Meeting Results 5/21/17 |
Bourne wrote: mattlikespie wrote: [size=150]Admin expectation changes Elites can target Members (excluding ban) Mass Freekill (MFK) results in a permanent CT ban instead of a permanent server ban - Note: Staff+ Will look into granting Veterans permission to offline CT ban Ctban for MFK? Why didn't you rather make it that 3-5 kills is ctban, more than that is perm ban? Because some people are going to MFK on purpose, and take a ctban. Why? this means they will be able to unban cbans? I don't like. Anyways just me being overly critical. maybe? still I have my reasons. The server dies slower this way, not sure what you mean by "this means they will be able to unban ctbans?". A permanent ctban would be treated the same as a perm, must be appealed on the forums. Not sure what reasons you could have behind objecting to that, you're not supposed to perm ban people just so you can be satisfied because they pissed you off, we're doing it because they're disruptive as a CT and it's a lot harder to be disruptive as a T. Honestly I think it'd be better if we went back and changed every perm ban for MFK to a perm CT ban. |
Author: | Northside Shorty [ Mon May 22, 2017 3:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Admin Meeting Results 5/21/17 |
So I take it if Cartoon and I sit through the next follow up meeting we are admins? I wanted to join because I really wanted to listen in on the changes to the community. |
Page 1 of 5 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |